<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>rtfa.net - Latest Comments in EPA suspends IBM from doing business with federal agencies</title><link>http://rtfa.disqus.com/</link><description>RTFA</description><atom:link href="https://rtfa.disqus.com/epa_suspends_ibm_from_doing_business_with_federal_agencies/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:47:27 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: EPA suspends IBM from doing business with federal agencies</title><link>http://www.rtfa.net/2008/03/31/epa-suspends-ibm-from-doing-business-with-federal-agencies#comment-3681859</link><description>&lt;p&gt;This is sure to put a TON of pressure on IBM.  In the style of Vonnegut's &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilium%2C_New_York" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ilium%2C_New_York"&gt;Ilium&lt;/a&gt;, I think our society will crumble if we have to go cold-turkey from our mainframe overlords.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Part of IBM's deal is that they make it possible to outsource hardware management of computing resources.  IBM can do things like watch your hardware for a failure, and then send out a tech to replace the component within the hour.  It's expensive, but it obviously makes sense sometimes.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">farkinga</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 01 Apr 2008 16:47:27 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>