http://rtfa.disqus.com/RTFAenTue, 25 Sep 2007 19:41:05 -0000http://rtfa.net/2007/09/25/elections-say-the-darndest-things-lieberman-senate-opponents-receive-exact-same-number-of-votes-in-2006-as-in-2000/#comment-3681680The one source was FEC and the other source was CNN. It's clear that CNN was rounding, so I'm not worried about the 0% items.<br><br>It's the raw counts that are most remarkable. We can assume this to be reliable, I hope, in the way that it is reported.farkingaTue, 25 Sep 2007 19:41:05 -0000http://rtfa.net/2007/09/25/elections-say-the-darndest-things-lieberman-senate-opponents-receive-exact-same-number-of-votes-in-2006-as-in-2000/#comment-3681679Pretty odd, I have trouble believing those graphs. Did you notice that the percentage is inaccurate in the second graph? 0% for the 4th and 5th runners up? The first graph has decimal points for the percentage, whereas the second graph is obviously rounding.fumfTue, 25 Sep 2007 19:29:01 -0000