DISQUS

Hello! rtfa.net is using DISQUS, a powerful comment system, to manage its comments. Learn more.

Community Page

rtfa.net Jump to website »

Subscribe
- New Comments
Community
Top Commenters
- farkinga
  71 comments · 1 points
- placidwater
  32 comments · 1 points
- MarkDavid
  3 comments · 1 points
- Hothead
  3 comments · 1 points
- Chris Charabaruk
  2 comments · 10 points
Popular Threads
- DoD Training Manual: Protests are “Low-Level Terrorism”
  1 week ago · 1 comment
Recent Comments
- LOL!! Nicotine inhaler wouldn't it be more addicting? we must be considerate with our health regarding with the activities we are doing such as drinking and smoking
  1 hour ago by chiropractic association
  
  in Smoking Without the Smoke: Nicotine Vaporizer
- It's really very helpful, thanks for the post.
  16 hours ago by back
  
  in OSX Tiger: Import email from Apple Mail 2.1 to Thunderbird 2.0
- I am trying to do the same project, but with a Tsop 1730 (IR receiver).... i have adapted the circuit, but impossible to create a contact with the remote! The Tsop detect frequence at arround 30kHz...
  18 hours ago by jeanot13
  
  in Arduino IR remote control - more advanced
- I don't care if what is the real reason why dinosaurs are extinct now.. I'm glad and thankful that there is no dinosaur today..
  1 day ago by Oakley Goggles
  
  in nsf.gov - Volcanoes, Not Asteroid, May Have Taken Out the Dinosaurs
- Just no limit to what these damn hackers will get up to
  3 days ago by traffic_ticket
  
  in BBC NEWS | Technology | Parking ticket leads to a virus

rtfa.net

RTFA

Jump to original thread »

Author

Elections Say the Darndest Things: Lieberman Senate Opponents Receive Exact Same Number of Votes in 2006 as in 2000…

Started by farkinga · 7 months ago

RTFA: http://www.bradblog.com/?p=3778
Elections Say the Darndest Things: Lieberman Senate Opponents Receive Exact Same Number of Votes in 2006 as in 2000…
At the risk of stoking conspiracy theories which I have no interesting in doing, I have absolutely no idea what ... Continue reading »

2 comments

fumf
1 year ago

Pretty odd, I have trouble believing those graphs. Did you notice that the percentage is inaccurate in the second graph? 0% for the 4th and 5th runners up? The first graph has decimal points for the percentage, whereas the second graph is obviously rounding.

reply

farkinga
1 year ago

The one source was FEC and the other source was CNN. It's clear that CNN was rounding, so I'm not worried about the 0% items.

It's the raw counts that are most remarkable. We can assume this to be reliable, I hope, in the way that it is reported.

reply

Add New Comment

Returning? Login